Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id XAA21703 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 23:29:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzvdx03599; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 23:25:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA08180; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 23:25:23 -0500
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 23:25:23 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <v02130505acffcd11385a@[192.0.2.1]>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: cjohnson@crl.com (Carl Andrew Johnson)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Photoshop vs. DPaint
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Someone posted a message saying what's the big deal about Photoshop. Well
I've used both and I prefer Photoshop.
As with anything, it all depends on what you're going to use it for. Since
I don't do anitmation on anything other than the PAR, DPaint's animation
feature are of no consequence to me. Photoshop has many 3rd party plug-ins
that give it incredible power. Photoshop is more of an image processing
program that paint program.
As far as batching goes, at least on the Mac side there is a free program
(was commercial) called Photomatic that lets you do batch processing with
Photoshop. As far as touching up scanned images, or doing work in layers
and saving in layers, Photoshop is THE best I've seen.
I love my Amiga, but sometimes you have to realize that depending on what
you're doing, there ARE better programs on better platforms.
